A recent meeting regarding the railroad siding (second rail) proposed by the LOSSAN rail corridor agency along Padaro Lane was reportedly heated, with residents in opposition—particularly because the plan will result in the removal of over 100 trees. Can you tell us more about the project? —B.
LOSSAN, shorthand for the Los Angeles–San Diego–San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency, which oversees the rail corridor from San Diego to San Luis Obispo, has long planned on “adding approximately one mile of new siding track alongside the existing rail line [in order to] create a critical ‘passing lane’ for trains, improving reliability and schedule flexibility,” according to LOSSAN’s Ortega Siding project website.
The Ortega Siding Project Study Report (June 2023) has more on the benefits of the “passing lane”: “The 16.7-mile single-track segment between CP CO385 (Seacliff) and CP CO369 (South Santa Barbara) greatly diminishes the railroad’s ability to increase service. Within this segment, trains are unable to operate bidirectionally. Trains must wait in one of the aforementioned sidings [Seacliff and Santa Barbara] until a train traveling in the opposing direction clears the track.”
According to the same report, “the goal for this segment of the corridor is to have a two hourly pattern for Pacific Surfliner service between Los Angeles Union Station and Goleta.”
There was once a siding west of Padaro Lane, south of Summerland, but it was “damaged by erosion, landslides, and sink holes on the ocean front cliffs during heavy rain events in the late 1970s. Most of the siding was taken out of service and removed in the early 1980s. The new proposed siding location is further inland to the east and would be protected against coastal erosion, landslides, and sea level rise that the old historic Ortega siding succumbed to.”
The new track would be constructed within the existing Union Pacific right-of-way, on the south side of the existing tracks roughly from the Loon Point parking lot to 3355 Padaro Lane. LOSSAN says that the total width of the new siding would be 30 to 40 feet, depending on the terrain.
Padaro Lane residents understandably have concerns, including air pollution, noise pollution, fire risk, and derailments. Perhaps most of all, how many trees would be cut down? As you can see in the drone footage below, many trees, or even most of the trees on that side of the street, encroach on the 30-40 feet of clearance. A LOSSAN rep emailed me that “the design phase of the Ortega Siding project is on hold until our capital projects team completes a tree survey. We don’t know if trees, or how many trees, may be impacted as part of this project until that survey is over. We’re anticipating having more information in the fall.” (The Ortega Siding is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act requirements because it “would support mass transit passenger rail operations conducted by the LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency on a rail line already in use.”)
LOSSAN materials cite “a growing demand for service to Santa Barbara, Goleta, and San Luis Obispo” as the reason for the new siding, but residents have yet to be convinced that it’s necessary, so I asked the rep for numbers to back that assertion up. The response:
Within Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo Counties specifically, ridership increased approximately 1% from FY24 to FY25 and is projected to grow by approximately 20% from FY25 to FY26. Since February 2026, ridership at stations within those two counties has increased by approximately 35%, coinciding with the addition of new service and increased travel options for passengers.
In FY25, approximately 509,500 passengers boarded or deboarded Pacific Surfliner trains at stations in Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo Counties. In FY26, that number is projected to increase to approximately 615,000 passengers.
And yet the Times of San Diego reported last November that while Amtrak ridership elsewhere in the nation has rebounded from a Covid-era dip, the Pacific Surfliner has not; it carried 2,776,654 riders in FY2019 (the final year before Covid), and only 2,043,059 in FY2025. And if the 2024 data in a Rail Passengers Association fact sheet is indicative of greater trends, traffic on the line skews highly toward points south of L.A.—which makes sense, given that the area between L.A. and San Diego is substantially more populous.
LOSSAN’s presentation to Padaro Lane residents says that construction would start in mid-2028, pending approvals, and take around two years. You can sign up for LOSSAN email updates about the Ortega Siding project here. And the Padaro Association is working on a petition opposing the plan, which I’ll link to here when it’s ready.
Is there a question you’d like investigated? Email [email protected] or text 917-209-6473.
················
Previous Burning Questions:
••• Will you explain the plan to adapt the waterfront for climate change?
↓↓↓ Why did the Rosewood Miramar Beach install gates?
••• How long will this big pipe be at East Beach?
••• Is Cabrillo Boulevard going to be widened under Highway 101?
••• Was there a Fisherman Inn in downtown Santa Barbara?
••• What are those old buildings at the corner of Castillo and Montecito streets?
••• What’s this scaffold structure on Las Positas Road?
••• Why does street striping take so long to happen?
••• Why do rocket launches look the way they do?
••• How is the San Ysidro Debris Basin designed to work?
••• What’s this building on Helena Avenue?
••• What are those old pilings in Arroyo Burro Creek?
••• What’s this building under construction in Toro Canyon?
••• What’s the story behind the seal of the City of Santa Barbara?
••• Butterfly Beach steps, green power lines, SBAG license plates, and more
••• What’s this pole with a flashing blue light?
••• What are these sculptures on the Riviera?
••• What’s the origin story of this fence on Hot Springs Road?
••• Why is part of this West Beach mosaic covered in concrete?
••• What was the Weeping Willow Inn?
••• What does the “S” on certain chimneys stand for?
••• What’s the status of the decommissioning of Rincon Island?
••• What happened to the gas flame on Highway 101?
••• What do we know about the proposed apartment complex at 1 Hot Springs Road?
••• What’s the history of this tower on Ortega Ridge?
••• What’s up with these sculptures on a hillside in Summerland?
••• Is there a master plan for the new walking paths in Montecito?
••• Why are the Thousand Steps still wet?
••• What’s happening with Sola Street?
••• Why is this lot on Milpas Street still vacant?
••• Where else do cruise ships that visit here go?
••• What is this large memorial in Ennisbrook?
••• Who bought the former St. Mary’s seminary—and why?
••• What will happen to the SBPD building when the new building is completed?
••• What’s the story with this house on W. Cota Street?
••• What are those little houses on Santa Barbara Street?
••• What’s the point of this light pole near the freeway?
••• What’s inside Paseo Nuevo’s State Street tower?
••• What’s the point of these markings on Laguna Street?
••• Why is there a giant red shoe off Highway 101?
••• What’s up with the “no e-bike” signs on local trails?
••• Why is Franceschi House in a holding pattern?
••• What’s happening with this derelict house in Summerland?
••• Can you explain how sundowner winds work?
••• Why is there a pressure cooker attached to this utility pole?
••• What’s this concrete ramp thing on East Beach?
••• Why does “USA” get written on the street?
••• What are those poles in the ocean near the Ritz-Carlton Bacara?
••• Are people really allowed to set fires in the middle of Montecito?
••• What’s the story with the half-finished lot next to the Montecito Country Mart?
Sign up for the Siteline email newsletter and you’ll never miss a post.



















The boomers will not be content, nor will the MAGAfication of montecito be complete, until every tree is replaced with a freeway lane, bike path, or rail line (or dirt sidewalk)
I am not a fan of removing trees but you are completely clueless in lumping rail mass transit in with freeway building. Such a NIMBY argument. We need less freeway construction and more train improvement. BUILD THE EXTRA TRACK!
I actually agree with you, much prefer this to the freeway expansion. But the tree loss is a real bummer. Folks should remember that it only took about 25 years for LA to transform from being mostly agricultural land to the LA of the 1970’s
Why on earth would we waste time and energy fighting the expansion of environmentally-friendly public transit options? Is this really how we want to be remembered by younger generations as our world spirals towards climate disaster? The fact that people are unironically citing pollution in their opposition is absurd, and reflects the reasons why we can’t get anything done in this country.
There’s a ton of private money and land surrounding this proposal. I expect a healthy fight of might meets right.
Big fan of trains!
I don’t understand the environmental argument for fighting this. Improved rail service increases ridership, which means more people opting to take the train who would have otherwise driven cars. Surely that has a bigger environmental impact than cutting down some trees, especially when new trees can be planted nearby.
I think this is a great project, and I think all the pearl clutching by the Padaro Lane folks is a bit premature.
LOSSAN reps said at the meeting that the designs aren’t far enough along to even know if they need to remove any trees, and they said that Union Pacific, which owns the line, gets to dictate the details of the design that will affect any tree loss. Even so, removing and replanting trees to enable more, lower emission capacity to travel between Santa Barbara County and the rest of the Central & Southern coast is a net win for the climate and keeps Highway 101 moving as our population and visitor numbers continue to grow.