Who Installed This Security Camera in Montecito?

There’s now a security camera at the intersection of Hot Springs Road and Olive Mill Road. Who’s responsible for it? —K.

In the fall of 2022, the Montecito Association shared that the “Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office will install automated license plate readers to aid in law enforcement investigations as part of a one-year trial. […] The cameras will be installed at major entries and exits to the county, and areas most impacted by significant criminal activity, including violent crime, high-value property crime, and rural crime. Montecito will have six cameras installed, about a fourth of the total for the county. […] The study doesn’t utilize our individual license plate data, but rather the SBSO organizational use of the ALPR system, and their ability to investigate crimes that occur within Santa Barbara County.” The association went on to say that “there will be a portal on the SB Sheriff’s Office website so the public can see where cameras are installed, data retention policies, and more.”

In the spring of 2023, the Montecito Association published an update that there would now be four Flock cameras in Montecito, rather than six, and installation was likely to happen in the coming weeks. The four locations: 129 Sheffield Drive (on N. Jameson Lane, just before Ortega Hill), 104 San Ysidro Road (between N. Jameson Lane and the northbound Highway 101 off-ramp), 385 San Ysidro Road (at Montecito Union School), and 191 La Vereda Road (the northern corner of San Ysidro Road).

The one at MUS is still there, but the others are gone. As for the new camera, the Sheriff’s Office confirmed that it’s one of the department’s Flock cameras and proffered a link to its “Transparency portal” on the Flock website. The page states around 300 law enforcement agencies in California have access to the data, but notably, it does not include where the cameras are installed. I asked the Sheriff’s Office how many Flock cameras the organization currently has operating in the South County, and in Montecito in particular, and also where they’re located. “The list of locations is not available for public release,” was the response.

The Montecito Association says it was not informed about the new camera or any others in the area. In fact, a representative of the organization told me that “Our Safety Committee discussed the matter and ultimately did not recommend that the board move forward [with Flock cameras] due to concerns regarding cost, legal issues, and limited effectiveness in solving local crimes.”

So the Sheriff’s Office felt some obligation to run the cameras by the Montecito Association the first time, but not the second. Was that because it didn’t want to hear the response? Not that the Montecito Association has any authority; its role is merely advisory.

The county’s Planning & Development department confirmed that an encroachment permit was issued in February 2025 for the location at Hot Springs and Olive Mill, and when pushed, it said that “permits of a similar nature have been issued for other locations in Montecito within the County right-of-way.” I also asked whether the public has any way of finding out about encroachment permits, perhaps by accessing a database, and I was told I would have to file a Public Record request. I did just that, and four permits came up: the new camera at Hot Springs and Olive Mill, the one at Montecito Union School, and ones at 4171 State Street and 4235 State Street.

I later discovered that encroachment permits can indeed be read on the county’s Accela Citizen Access Portal. It’s clunky, but I did manage to find four more permits related to Flock cameras—three in Santa Maria (3325 Black Road, 4141 Black Road, and 3435 Black Road), and one in Montecito at Birnam Wood’s Sheffield Drive exit (450 Eastgate Lane). That last one had this note: “Double fee for being installed prior to permit being issued.”

Of course, cameras of all kinds are everywhere these days; ones on private land often share data with police. Personally speaking, I don’t like the idea of being surveilled at all, but especially by the state, and even more so without any oversight from another governmental body.

Is there a question you’d like investigated? Email [email protected] or text 917-209-6473.

················

Previous Burning Questions:
••• Why are the railroad tracks being expanded along Padaro Lane?
••• Will you explain the plan to adapt the waterfront for climate change?
••• Why did the Rosewood Miramar Beach install gates?
••• How long will this big pipe be at East Beach?
••• Is Cabrillo Boulevard going to be widened under Highway 101?
••• Was there a Fisherman Inn in downtown Santa Barbara?
••• What are those old buildings at the corner of Castillo and Montecito streets?
••• What’s this scaffold structure on Las Positas Road?
••• Why does street striping take so long to happen?
••• Why do rocket launches look the way they do?
••• How is the San Ysidro Debris Basin designed to work?
••• What’s this building on Helena Avenue?
••• What are those old pilings in Arroyo Burro Creek?
••• What’s this building under construction in Toro Canyon?
••• What’s the story behind the seal of the City of Santa Barbara? 
••• Butterfly Beach steps, green power lines, SBAG license plates, and more
••• What’s this pole with a flashing blue light?
••• What are these sculptures on the Riviera?
••• What’s the origin story of this fence on Hot Springs Road?
↓↓↓ Why is part of this West Beach mosaic covered in concrete?
••• What was the Weeping Willow Inn?
••• What does the “S” on certain chimneys stand for?
••• What’s the status of the decommissioning of Rincon Island?
••• What happened to the gas flame on Highway 101?
••• What do we know about the proposed apartment complex at 1 Hot Springs Road?
••• What’s the history of this tower on Ortega Ridge?
••• What’s up with these sculptures on a hillside in Summerland?
••• Is there a master plan for the new walking paths in Montecito?
••• Why are the Thousand Steps still wet?
••• What’s happening with Sola Street?
••• Why is this lot on Milpas Street still vacant?
••• Where else do cruise ships that visit here go?
••• What is this large memorial in Ennisbrook?
••• Who bought the former St. Mary’s seminary—and why?
••• What will happen to the SBPD building when the new building is completed?
••• What’s the story with this house on W. Cota Street?
••• What are those little houses on Santa Barbara Street?
••• What’s the point of this light pole near the freeway?
••• What’s inside Paseo Nuevo’s State Street tower?
••• What’s the point of these markings on Laguna Street?
••• Why is there a giant red shoe off Highway 101?
••• What’s up with the “no e-bike” signs on local trails?
••• Why is Franceschi House in a holding pattern?
••• What’s happening with this derelict house in Summerland?
••• Can you explain how sundowner winds work?
••• Why is there a pressure cooker attached to this utility pole?
••• What’s this concrete ramp thing on East Beach?
••• Why does “USA” get written on the street?
••• What are those poles in the ocean near the Ritz-Carlton Bacara?
••• Are people really allowed to set fires in the middle of Montecito?
••• What’s the story with the half-finished lot next to the Montecito Country Mart?

················

Sign up for the Siteline email newsletter and you’ll never miss a post.

Comment:

15 Comments

Pam Strobel

i may be in the minority, but this doesn’t bother me. Cameras are one of the best ways to help solve crimes and I’m willing to put up with them (as you say, they are almost everywhere anyway).

Reply
Christine!

I support the use of cameras in the community- as a fire watch tool alone it makes sense. Having it as a tool to see activity pre/post of a crime situation seems prudent to me. The days of privacy out in the general public = stolen by scammers & thieves who use game cams to chart your at home time/away time to break into your house.

Reply
Sam Tababa

No one is surprised when a loud, proud and well documented Bootlicker, declares that they like to lick boots.

Reply
Christine!

Better a bootlicker than a serial screaming sociopath. Why is it you can’t allow another POV- you live amongst a crowd, not in single vial…

Reply
The Montecito Marriage Counselor

Sam and Christine!, you two should grab a coffee. I think you have more in common than either of you realizes!

Reply
Tomas

So long as they’re not installing red light cameras and giving us automated tickets for rolling through lights and stop signs and speeding I’m okay with this, too.

Reply
John

I absolutely support using this technology to help catch criminal activity, it is a great tool for law enforcement.

Reply
Dan

I’ve watched enough episodes of “Forensic Files,” to know how helpful cameras like this can be in solving some murders. However, it’s ironic that the camera in this photo is in the spot where a number of people died in the Montecito debris flow. I thought Sheriff Bill Brown made the wrong call in the evacuation zones as most of the victims were in the Advisory Zone, south of East Valley road. If he had resigned in the weeks after I believe that would have been honorable. But he didn’t. In the last two elections I recall the Deputies union endorsed Brown’s opponents. That was significant to me. I don’t trust “the Sheriff’s Office,” in this matter.

Reply
Michael

Just Google “Flock sharing data” and click the news tab. You’ll find stories like, “Federal and out-of-state agencies “improperly” searched San Francisco license-plate data gathered through the police department’s Flock system of surveillance cameras, a department audit released Wednesday found.”
Not a big deal as we don’t break the law. Then…you end-up with a federal government that retaliates or harasses its citizens.

Reply
Aimee

Quick check at open source map will show where these are. https://deflock.org/
Delete your data: email [email protected] (name + plate + state)
In CA? Cite the CCPA right to deletion.
Also hit the local police dept or HOA running the cameras — that’s where the real leverage is.
Then ask your city council: Do we have a Flock contract? Can police search without a warrant? Who gets access?
Ready-to-send California deletion email — fill in the four brackets and send:
To: [email protected]
Subject: CCPA/CPRA Request to Delete Personal Information — [Your Full Name]
To Whom It May Concern,
I am a California resident submitting this request under the California Consumer Privacy Act, as amended by the CPRA (Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.105), exercising my right to deletion.
I request that Flock Safety delete all personal information it has collected, stored, or processed that is associated with me, my vehicle(s), and members of my household, including but not limited to license plate reads, vehicle images, location data, and any derived records.
My information for matching purposes:
Full name: [Your Full Name]
License plate number: [Plate Number]
State of registration: California
Vehicle (make/model/color): [e.g. 2026 Range Rover HSE, white]
I do not consent to the collection, storage, or sharing of data about me, my vehicles, or my household members in any future instance, and I request confirmation in writing once this deletion is complete.
If you contend you are acting solely as a service provider or processor on behalf of a customer, please identify the specific customer(s) and agency contact so I may direct this request accordingly, and forward this request to them as required under Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.140(ag).
Please confirm receipt and provide your response within the timeframe required by law.
Regards,
[Your Full Name]
[City, State, ZIP]

Reply